I’m using a Cisco VPN Client (4.9.01) on Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.4). Yesterday I installed VMware Fusion (1.1.3), and today I noticed that my VPN wasn’t working anymore.
The error:
"Error 51: Unable to communicate with the VPN subsystem.
Please make sure that you have at least one network interface that is currently active and has an IP address and start this application again."
After some rooting around I suspected that Cisco was getting hung up on vmnet1 and vmnet8, VMware’s virtual network interfaces. My troubleshooting process pretty quickly landed on restarting the Cisco kernel extension, which fixed it. There are multiple ways to do this, but here’s the commands I used:
sudo /System/Library/StartupItems/CiscoVPN/CiscoVPN stop
sudo /System/Library/StartupItems/CiscoVPN/CiscoVPN start
I can identify with the conditions (complexity, time constraints, etc) that would give rise to these errors. But when you step back, it’s quite humorous. From an ideal perspective, messages like these shouldn’t really happen.
Seeing this really annoys me. I thought in the age of the long tail (challenges notwithstanding) we were beyond antique distribution limitations like this.
I know some of it has to do with legal issues. It’s still very disappointing to see.
Recently, my girlfriend and I were going reading through one of the word-play submissions by Howard Bergerson and we found an error. This self-documenting sentence does not add up (link):
“In this sentence, the word and occurs twice, the word eight occurs twice, the word four occurs twice, the word fourteen occurs four times, the word in occurs twice, the word seven occurs twice, the word the occurs fourteen times, the word this occurs twice, the word times occurs seven times, the word twice occurs eight times and the word word occurs fourteen times.”
Clearly, the word fourteen doesn’t occur four times, for example.
I couldn’t dig up an errata page for the book, so I’m posting here. Am I wrong?
My girlfriend and I shop at the Whole Foods headquarters in downtown Austin, usually a couple of times a week. Today we had our goods on the conveyor when my girlfriend ran off. Right after I finished paying, she came back with an açaí sorbet and said she had to try it.
“Then it’s on us,” said the clerk.
“Really?”
“Yeah, they encourage us to give away things.”
“Cool, thanks!”
I know Whole Foods has had some controversies recently regarding CEO John Mackey’s surreptitious forum posting habits, and we’ve had our complaints about the quality of their lemons, but I can’t fault the freebie policy. It’s especially appropriate when customers are paying a premium for boutique foods.
Now if they would only get some castelvetrano olives — California stores have ‘em, so why can’t we?
I can sort-of buy the idea that the IMDB gaming incident represents a failure, though I would argue that it’s only a minor one. Having The Godfather drop to number two or even three on the list seems like evidence for a temporal mobbing weakness in the ranking implementation. More…